Friday, 15 April 2016

The Write Stuff at The London Book Fair




Yesterday I arrived for 'The Write Stuff' session at LBF16 with plenty of time to spare, which was fortunate, as the signs for Author HQ were misleading, telling me to go up the stairs, when the only stairs led down. I felt a bit like the white rabbit in 'Alice in Wonderland', darting along between the stalls, looking at my watch and muttering to myself.



I arrived at an area of pink wooden bench seats, padded with white plastic cushions (quite in keeping with `Alice in Wonderland') and managed to find myself a perch, before it became standing-room only (which, for nearly 2 hours wouldn’t have been great). The event was sponsored by Kindle Direct Publishing, which I found a little odd, since it was all about pitching to agents. Maybe we were all supposed to take away Despair from the event.



I sat next to a woman who’d written a book about dating. She said it was packed full of tips and handy hints, based on her own experience, but since she referred to her partner’s several children and, as a therapist, I’ve heard all about the perils and pitfalls of being a `step mum’, I wondered whether there might perhaps be better advice available elsewhere. She left halfway through.



The event was introduced as `The Voice’ meets `Dragon’s Den’. Six authors who’d been shortlisted from the hundred or more who’d sent in their synopses and `I should be picked because’ 500 words were going to get a chance to pitch for 3 minutes exactly (there was a harsh buzzer) to 3 agents who would then each have 3 minutes to respond. The agents had read 3 chapters from each of the selected books in advance.



The first person we were introduced to was Sanjeev, who won last year. He said he’d been apprehensive, but it had all been very `cordial’. He’d appreciated all the constructive criticism and it had been like `a dream come true’, as he’d come away with two offers of representation. His advice to the six contestants was `Proudly present your creation’ and `Don’t look at the audience!’



He said he could be lazy and he’d had the idea for the novel for 10 years, but it was only because he’d had knee surgery that he’d had the time and motivation to write the first chapters from his bed two months before the competition. His novel is called `The Insignificance of Good Intentions’ (which I decided was either brilliant or ridiculous), a first person account of a journalist in India, dealing with caste and politics, prison and romance. He referred to the agent he’d picked as Toby (better Google that one, I thought, how many Toby agents can there be? Toby Mundy? Toby Eady?) Sanjeev said he was in touch with Toby every couple of months and relied on him as an `industry insider’. He intends to finish the first draft by the end of July. Wow, I thought, does this guy have any idea how lucky he is? A dream come true indeed.

We were then introduced to the three agents: Ella Kahn, from DKW, who’s just won the LBF Trailblazer Award; Sheila Crowley from Curtis Brown, who likes stories that make her cry and Tim Bates from PFD, who covers cookery, celebrity memoirs and commercial fiction. (I looked him up on the way home and Pollinger aren’t accepting any unsolicited submissions right now, plus he’s not on Twitter- so what, perhaps).
First up was Karen, whose hand understandably shook as she held the microphone. She’d written a YA thriller, `Off The Rails’, about murder, arson and stealing a kiss, dealing with a myriad of topics, including self-harm and cyber-bullying.
Tim liked the different layers, but only represents one YA author. He found it slightly breathless and told her to make the writing more elegant. Ella, who does do YA, agreed, but liked the strong characterisation. She felt that the pitch should have had more focus on what actually happens. Sheila loved the premise, but suggested making the opening calmer and deciding what would make the reader `jump in’ and relate to the characters. She recommended her ex assistant, Rebecca Ritchie, who is `brilliant’ at YA.
Next came Tony, who has written ‘The Blog of Samuel Pepys’. Pepys finds himself stuck in 2016 and spends his time getting into hilarious scrapes, such as cruising churches for pick up opportunities. Tony felt this would be very popular as a gift book.
Ella said this was not a genre for her, although she enjoyed the concept. She wondered, (as did I) why Pepys found himself in 2016 and why his wife was coping better. Sheila felt humour was difficult to sell and to publish. Tim found it `huge fun’, but felt it needed a `narrative context’.
Susannah had written a `creative biography’ of Maude West who ran a detective agency in the Twenties and Thirties and was a Queen of PR, creating a false persona for herself- in reality she was the illegitimate daughter of a servant girl and had 6 kids.
Tim said it was a brilliant idea for a book, but felt it needed to be a more sober work. Ella was interested and intrigued, but was confused as to whether it was a novelisation or a biography. Sheila is a big fan of detectives, but felt it wasn’t for her.
Dave decided to do his pitch as a screen presentation, which crashed a few times (much to my secret delight). He was a pilot who has written `Infiltration’, a cold war aviation thriller.
Sheila said she wasn’t the right agent, as this was a man’s world. Ella felt the pitch was impressive, but she would be wary of taking on a previously self-published author and she knew nothing about planes. Tim wondered why he wanted to move to traditional publishing and  suggested it was too detailed and could be cut by a third. Ouch!
Nathalie has written `Not my Soldier’ about collateral damage far from the front line. She herself has worked in conflict zones, seemed eloquent, engaging and humble. Even before the agents responded, I felt she was the best so far.
Ella loved her prose and wanted to read more, Sheila said, `You’re amazing’. She said she `got the tickle at the back of her neck’, when she read it, which happened once every three years, at most. This turned me a little green. (She read an early draft of my psychological thriller and said it was too intellectual for her and recommended a fellow agent, who loved my writing and the protagonist, but wasn’t convinced by the plot. No tickle for me). Tim said Nathalie was a very strong writer, but he found the smaller chapters a bit `arch’.
Finally John pitched his novel, `The Dreaming Mechanicals’, which is the story of a videographer who answers an ad and films the final tour of the eponymous mechanicals. Tim said he wrote beautifully but wasn’t sure what the book was about or what the market might be. Ella liked the writing and his sense of humour, but wondered again where it might `sit’. Sheila liked the narrative voice, but again found it hard to position commercially.
Needless to say, Nathalie won and picked Sheila to represent her. She got a bottle of champagne, a framed certificate and her photograph with everyone, including the now 80 something year old bookseller whom she’d first worked for aged 13. She was obviously a precocious child, as she’d told him he wasn’t to close down till she had her own book in the window. Not long to go now then.
 







No comments:

Post a Comment